About
For more than 20 years I’ve worked in strategic communication shaping corporate narratives, strengthening leadership messaging and helping strategy land where influence matters more than formal authority. Much of that in regulated industries and politically sensitive organisations, where scrutiny is high and credibility is not assumed. I’ve led brand transformation across pharma, FMCG and technology, and I currently lead brand and corporate communications for an international pharmaceutical company.
I see communication as a business discipline: it builds trust, shapes reputation and makes change last. Treated as messaging alone, it opens a distance between what an organisation intends and what people actually experience.
It shows up when a corporate brand doesn’t reflect the organisation behind it. When a strategy is clear at the top but doesn’t land across the business. When leadership communication is well-intended but isn’t experienced as credible or relevant.
The distance is created and closed in what a leader says at a town hall, in how a specialist is heard in a steering group, in what colleagues repeat to each other afterwards. Corporate communication and leadership communication are the same problem at different scale.
That distance tends to widen when something is changing — a new strategy, a restructuring, a transformation nobody asked for. The stakes are higher then, communication is scrutinised more closely, and people are communicating under pressure. Any inconsistency in what is said or in how it lands creates ambiguity that slows the work down. Closing the gap is what my work centres on.